hows ffi?

[Raoul Duke]

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2082

:-)

[Taylor R Campbell]

Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:47:13 -0700
From: Raoul Duke <***@gmail.com>

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2082

That thread is about Scheme48's C FFI, not about PreScheme's C FFI.

[Raoul Duke]

Post by Raoul Duke
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2082
That thread is about Scheme48's C FFI, not about PreScheme's C FFI.

thanks, good point. does PreScheme have one? how does it fare? is
Scheme48s any different now as well? :-)

[Michael Sperber]

Post by Raoul Duke

Post by Raoul Duke
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2082
That thread is about Scheme48's C FFI, not about PreScheme's C FFI.

thanks, good point. does PreScheme have one? how does it fare?

It's very different as PreScheme has no run-time system to speak of.
(Other than C's run-time system.) Grep for "external" in the scheme/vm
directory for a bunch of examples.

Post by Raoul Duke
is Scheme48s any different now as well? :-)

Yes.

[Michael Sperber]

Post by Taylor R Campbell
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:47:13 -0700
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2082
That thread is about Scheme48's C FFI, not about PreScheme's C FFI.

It's also about Scheme 48's old FFI, not the current one, that Marcus
Crestani has since replaced.